Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.
Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative, according to the authors of a study of the introduction of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in a single hospital in Switzerland. They found no differences in outpatient costs, inpatient costs, and length of hospital stays associated with introduction of the biosimilar.
Image credit: Suteren Studio - stock.adobe.com
The economic impact of non-medical switching is “subject to debate,” the authors said, as many economic evaluations have focused on drug purchase prices alone and have not considered health resource utilization. Costs associated with training medical staff, additional laboratory tests, administrative procedures, potentially switching back to another biologic, additional outpatient visits, and hospital stays may reduce the cost savings from the purchase price of the drug.
Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, is used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. CT-P13 was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2013 and entered the market in Switzerland in 2016. The retrospective cohort study assessed health care expenditures in Swiss francs (CHF) of patients treated with the reference infliximab or the biosimilar CT-P13, based on outpatient costs, inpatient costs, and length of inpatient stays. Patients with inflammatory autoimmune diseases who were part of a previous retrospective study on reasons for discontinuation of CT-P13 were enrolled from a university hospital in Western Switzerland.
There were seven cohorts including 60 patients in immuno-allergology, 84 in rheumatology and 114 in gastroenterology:
The authors noted a few differences in patient characteristics between cohorts: patients who switched to CT-P13 and back to the originator were older (mean, 54 years) than those who started and discontinued the originator (mean, 34) and patients who started and discontinued CT-P13 (mean, 36). Also there was a higher proportion of female patients in the cohort that started and discontinued the reference product compared to the group that switched from the reference product to CT-P13 and maintained CT-P13.
Overall, inpatient costs were CHF 1,611 (SD, 1,020) per hospital day and outpatient costs were CHF 4,991 (SD, 6,931) per infusion, and the length of stay was 20 (SD, 28) days.
Because of the small sample size, the investigators used bootstrap analyses to compare outpatient and inpatient costs between cohorts: Patients who started and maintained CT-P13 and those who switched from the reference product to CT-P13 and then discontinued CT-P13 had lower mean costs per infusion than patients who switched from the reference product to CT-P13 and maintained CT-P13 and those who switched from the reference product to CT-P13 and back to the reference product. For inpatient costs, the patients who started then discontinued CT-P13 had a lower mean cost per hospital day than those who started and maintained the reference product.
The authors reported that multivariable analysis showed differences in both outpatient and inpatient costs by disease category, with rheumatology patients having higher mean cost per infusion than patients in gastroenterology or immuno-allergology. Patients in rheumatology and immuno-allergology had higher mean costs per inpatient hospital day than patients in gastroenterology. However, the authors noted that age was positively associated with costs, and patients in gastroenterology tended to be younger in their cohorts.
Length of stay was significantly different between some cohorts: patients who started then discontinued CT-P13 had shorter hospital stays compared to those who started then discontinued the reference product and those who started and maintained CT-P13.
The authors concluded that the introduction of CT-P13 in this hospital and any associated disruption of treatment management were not associated with differences in average outpatient costs, inpatient costs, or length of stay. They called for further research to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and benefits to patients associated with non-medical switching policies.
Reference
Krstic M, Devaud JC, Sadeghipour F, Marti J. Does the introduction of an infliximab biosimilar always result in savings for hospitals? A descriptive study using real-world data. Health Econ Rev. 2024;14(1):31. doi:10.1186/s13561-024-00507-5
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.