Wayne Winegarden, PhD, director of the Center for Medical Economics and Innovation, explains that misaligned incentives are preventing the United States from realizing full benefit from biosimilars.
Patients could save as much as 17% on out-of-pocket costs if they used biosimilars, but many obstacles make that difficult to achieve, noted Wayne Winegarden, PhD, director of the Center for Medical Economics and Innovation at the Pacific Research Institute, a conservative policy analysis group in California.
He believes that legislators have a lot of work to do to pull out the blocks and wedges that prevent full realization of biosimilar savings.
“Since biologic medicines are some of the most expensive drugs that are driving the affordability problem in the United States, biosimilar competition can meaningfully reduce these cost pressures and improve overall affordability,” he said in a recent interview with Managed Healthcare Executive®.
Market dynamics are differnent in Europe, where biosimilar discounts are 20% to 40% lower than in the United States, Winegarden said. That’s a lofty goal to aim for.
The IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science recently developed a scorecard for biosimilar access achievement in the European Union. It showed which countries are ahead in getting biosimilars to patients and why. The country-by-country breakdown rated countries' biosimilar markets on sustainability, the degree to which drug prices have fallen since the introduction of biosimilars, the health of biosimilar competition, and potential for growth. Norway and Sweden and the United Kingdom were among the leading countries for biosimilar adoption, though none of these markets was perfect, according to the analysis. Poland was among the laggers, in part because it takes a year or longer before an approved biosimilar reaches market in that country.
"A lot of my recent research has been looking at biosimilars and specifically trying to quantify the amount of savings that are available, because we haven't had the market develop here the way you have seen biosimilars develop in Europe, nor the same way that you've seen generics developed to become 90% of market here," Winegarden told The Center for Biosimilars® recently.
The biosimilar savings available to Medicare could reach $6.2 billion to $10.5 billion based on Winegarden’s calculation of biosimilars representing 25% to 75% of prescriptions for 9 drug classes for which biosimilars have been approved. “Greater savings can be had if biosimilars reach a higher share and biosimilars are introduced in more drug classes,” he said.
One way to achieve this is to change the incentives that in some cases discourage the use of biosimilars. One thing that tends to happen is that formularies list the more expensive originator biologics as the preferred drug, and so patients must fail on these medications before lower-cost biosimilars can be employed.
He suggested, as a solution, the creation of a formulary tier specifically for lower-cost biosimilars with lower co-pays and coinsurance rates.
Under the current system, providers can actually lose money by prescribing the lower-cost drug, and this is a disincentive that needs to be remedied, Winegarden said. “Removing the disincentives discouraging the development of a healthy biosimilars market is essential for making this happen.”
For more from this interview with Winegarden, visit managedhealthcare.com.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.