When treating any disease, adherence is key. Specifically, however, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), adhering to biologic therapy is critical in the management of these diseases, as previous research has demonstrated that a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 0.86 significantly increases the risk of disease flare.
When treating any disease, adherence is key. Specifically, however, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), adhering to biologic therapy is critical in the management of these diseases, as previous research has demonstrated that a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 0.86 significantly increases the risk of disease flare.
To further explore the risk factors in non-adherence, researchers presenting their findings at the American College of Gastroenterology’s annual meeting conducted a retrospective study1 to evaluate patients treated at a tertiary care IBD center prescribed a biologic therapy (either adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, or ustekinumab). To be included in the study patients had to have filled 3 prescription claims with the center’s specialty pharmacy.
MPR was calculated as the days’ supply for all prescription claims divided by the total number of days that had elapsed during the study period. Non-adherence to medication was defined as MPR less than 0.86.
In total, the researchers enrolled 560 patients (393 patients with Crohn disease [CD] and 67 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) in the retrospective analysis. The overall mean MPR was 0.89. Researchers found that 71% of patients with CD and 87% of patients with UC were adherent. However, the study was able to identify several risk factors that increase the risk of non-adherence in a univariate analysis including a diagnosis of CD, insurance type, psychiatric history, smoking, prior biologic use, and narcotic use.
In patients with CD, as the number of risk factors present increased, the probability of non-adherence significantly increased. The study authors identified that adherence was 77% and 73% in patients with 0-1 risk factors, decreasing to 65%, 61%, and 37% in patients with 2, 3, or 4 risk factors, respectively (P <.05).
Another study2 presented at the meeting sought to identify treatment outcomes of patients with IBD with early disease control. In order to evaluate biologic treatment outcomes in early CD and UC, researchers conducted a systematic literature review.
In total, 19 studies in CD (6 clinical and 13 observational), 3 in UC and 1 in both CD and UC (all observational) were included in the review. Studies evaluated the effectiveness of infliximab (CD: 15 papers, UC: 4 papers), adalimumab (CD: 9 papers, UC: 3 papers) and certolizumab pegol (CD: 4 papers) as mono- or combination biologic therapy with conventional therapy.
The study authors reported that risk factors for disease progression were noted at baseline only in select studies. Outcomes were assessed at >54 weeks in 10 (50%) of CD studies and 3 (75%) UC studies.
The researchers recommended that there needs to be a more thorough consideration of patients’ baseline risk of disease progression and assessment of long-term outcomes in order to more effectively evaluate early biologic use in achieving disease control.
For future studies, the authors also noted that the measures of these outcomes should also be consistent to support comparisons among the interventions.
References
1. Haydek J, Shah N, Slaughter J, et al. risk factors for medication non-adherence to biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective analysis. Presented at the 83rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, October 5-10, 2018; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Abstract 570. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41395-018-0296-0.pdf.
2. Jairath V, Wright D, Calleja A, et al. Assessment of biologic treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients with ‘early disease’: results of a systematic literature review.Presented at the 83rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, October 5-10, 2018; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Abstract 584. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41395-018-0296-0.pdf.
Study Documents HCPs’ Experiences of a Mandatory Switch to Inform Future Transitions
December 2nd 2023A survey explores the experiences of health care providers (HCP) throughout the transition process following a mandatory switch from the adalimumab originator (Humira) to a biosimilar in New Zealand in 2022.
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Public Payer in Poland Saves €243 Million by Using Biosimilar TNF Inhibitors
November 11th 2023The use of biosimilars of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors within Poland’s public payer saved over €243 million from 2013 to 2021, with about 68% of that coming from the rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases alone.
Real-World Data Confirm Safety, Efficacy of CT-P13 in Inflammatory Diseases
November 9th 2023A real-world analysis from Japan confirmed that CT-P13, an intravenous infliximab biosimilar, had comparable safety and efficacy to the reference product (Remicade; infliximab) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.