A bill called the “Improving Access to Affordable Prescription Drugs Act” (S771) was introduced on March 29, 2017, by Senator Al Franken of Minnesota and 15 co-sponsoring Democrats to improve the Affordable Care Act by bringing down the skyrocketing prices of prescription drugs, which the Senators state is one of the main reasons why healthcare costs are rising.
The bill seeks to tackle prescription drug costs by increasing transparency and accountability, boosting access and affordability of key drugs, spurring innovation, and increasing choice and competition. A companion bill [H 1776] with the same name was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois and 4 co-sponsoring Democrats.
The bill notes “much of the biomedical innovation motivating new drug discovery is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other federal programs.” To better understand how research and development costs, manufacturing and marketing costs, acquisitions, federal investments, revenues and sales, and other factors influence drug prices, the bill requires drug makers to disclose this information, by product, to the secretary of the HHS, who in turn will make it publicly available.
The bill will examine how patient assistance programs affect drug prices and “the extent to which drug makers are using independent charity assistance programs to drive up profits.” It also allows the secretary of HHS to negotiate with drug companies to lower prescription drug prices for Medicare, which it is not currently allowed to do. HHS can only negotiate drug prices for Medicaid and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
In addition, the bill will do the following:
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.