Earlier this month, the United States, Mexico, and Canada entered into the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, or USMCA, an updated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Since the details of the agreement were released, the pharmaceutical intellectual property portions of the deal have come under scrutiny.
Earlier this month, the United States, Mexico, and Canada entered into the United States—Mexico–Canada Agreement, or USMCA, an updated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Since the details of the agreement were released, the pharmaceutical intellectual property portions of the deal have come under scrutiny.
Under the newly negotiated deal, US drug companies will be able to sell pharmaceutical products in Canada for 10 years without facing generic or biosimilar competition. This is an increase from the 8 years of exclusivity under NAFTA.
Jim Keon, president of the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association (CGPA), had concerns about this aspect of the agreement. “The pharmaceutical provisions in USMCA will delay access to competition from biosimilar biologic drugs. Biologic medicines represent the fastest growing cost segment of healthcare spending, and these delays will be costly to patients, business that sponsor employee drug plans, private payers and our industry,” he said.
Keon went on to discuss how the result of the agreement is disappointing for “the vast majority of Canadians who feel access to more affordable prescription medicines is the most important aspect of the negotiations.” Keon cited a recent poll conducted by Morning Consult for the CGPA from September 14-16, 2018, which found that 4 in 5 Canadians feel that it is important that the negotiations do not delay Canadians access to more affordable biologic drugs.
Conversely, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) president and CEO Stephen J. Ubl spoke out in support of the agreement and specifically the intellectual property changes.
“The United States—Mexico–Canada Agreement marks a historic point for US trade policy, cementing critical intellectual property protections and other standards that will pave the way for the next generation of treatment and cures.” Ubl described intellectual property as the “lifeblood” of the biopharmaceutical industry and congratulated the Trump administration on the accomplishment of reaching such a “strong trade deal.”
This new agreement will not go into effect immediately. Most of the provisions are not set to begin until 2020 pending signatures from the leaders of the 3 countries and legislative approval.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.