Neutropenia, a common complication in patients administered myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies, is often treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). A budget impact study comparing home-administration of tbo-filgrastim, filgrastim-sndz, and filgrastim suggests that increasing tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz utilization for patients who self-administer the drugs may offer a more affordable option for US payers.
Tbo-filgrastim (Granix) and filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio) are, respectively, a follow-on biologic and a biosimilar version of the reference G-CSF filgrastim (Neupogen), with comparable efficacy and safety. Researchers Holly Trautman, PharmD, MS, of Aventine Consulting, Marblehead, MA, and colleagues created a budget impact model to estimate increasing utilization of home (patient)-administered tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy from a US payer perspective. They estimated the changes in drug costs associated with projected increases in market share of tbo-filgrastim from 5% to 10% and filgrastim-sndz from 10% to 12%, for a 1-million-member health plan. The overall budget impact was calculated over a 1-year period, along with the difference in per-member, per-year (PMPY) cost between current and future scenarios. One-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
It was assumed that 20% of patients receiving short-acting G-CSFs were self-administrating the medications at home. All products were decided upon through pharmacy benefits (Tier 3 formulary status; patient co-pay of $54/prescription). The model assumed syringe replacement rates of 1% for tbo-filgrastim and 5% for filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz because of differences in stability.
The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost totaled between $17,249 and $27,657, depending on dose and presentation, for tbo-filgrastim; between $17,043 and $27,332 for filgrastim-sndz; and between $18,034 and $32,212 for filgrastim. The estimated overall annual plan cost associated with short-acting G-CSFs was $55,920,046 (PMPY, $55.92) in the current scenario and $55,346,277 (PMPY, $55.34) in the future scenario. Estimated cost savings totaled $573,769 (PMPY, $0.58). The authors said the model was most sensitive to changes in the overall proportion of patients self-administering G-CSFs at home and to the wholesale acquisition cost for filgrastim.
Based on their analysis, the authors concluded that the effective annual plan per-patient drug cost for tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz was 14% to 15% lower than for filgrastim. “Estimated annual US health plan cost savings were in excess of $0.5 million overall, or $0.50 PMPY following small shifts in market shares,” they noted.
The authors presented their findings at the annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy in Denver, Colorado, March 27-30, 2017.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.