In order to investigate the best morning insulin therapy to improve glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes, researchers from Japan compared morning injections of insulin glulisine and insulin glargine with injections of insulin lispro and insulin glargine biosimilar.
In order to investigate the best morning insulin therapy to improve glycemic variability (GV) in patients with type 2 diabetes, researchers from Japan compared morning injections of insulin glulisine and insulin glargine with injections of insulin lispro and insulin glargine biosimilar. The results of the study were presented at The American Diabetes Association 77th Scientific Sessions.
The study enrolled 30 patients with type 2 diabetes, all of whom wore continuous glucose monitoring devices in admission after glucose levels (GL) were stabilized by morning insulins (long-acting and ultra-rapid). The patients were randomized to 2 groups: the first group received morning injections of 300 units per milliliter of the reference treatment, insulin glulisine and insulin glargine, on days 1 and 2 of treatment, followed by the same dose of insulin lispro and insulin glargine biosimilar on days 3 and 4. The second group received the biosimilar for the first 2 days of treatment, followed by the reference treatment on the final 2 days.
The patients received insulin injections at 8:00 am, and test meals were subsequently given. A day was defined as the period from 8:00 am to the following 8:00 am. On days 2 and 4, researches assessed the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) and the mean of daily differences (MODD). The researchers found that increased post-breakfast (PB) GL, PB glucose gradients, mean GL, standard deviation, M- value (12:00 am to 6:00 am), MAGE, and MODD were significantly lower in patients receiving the reference treatment than in the patients receiving the biosimilar treatment:
Pre-lunch and pre-breakfast GL were significantly lower in patients receiving the biosimilar treatment than in those receiving the reference. The difference in the highest PB GL between the groups was significantly correlated to 24-hour mean GL (r = 0.4, P = .03).
The researchers concluded that, compared with the biosimilar treatment, the reference treatment decreases PB GL, reducing the rate of rise, nocturnal and 24-hour GV and GL without causing hypoglycemia, and daily variance.
Panelists Deliberate Strategies to Enhance Biosimilar Integration in Managed Care Spaces
November 13th 2023At the recent Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus meeting, panelists discussed the impact of introducing biosimilars in new medical fields, emphasizing the need for more education and collaboration to ensure their smooth integration into health care systems.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Commercial Biosimilar Coverage Is on the Rise, but Preferences Still Vary
October 28th 2023A poster from AMCP Nexus quantifies trends in biosimilar coverage within Tufts Medical Center, finding that payer coverage of these products has increased but individual preferences among payers still vary.
"Not So Different": How the BPCIA Transition Will Affect Biosimilar Uptake
April 10th 2020This week on the podcast, we’re speaking with the executive director of the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC), Cate Lockhart, PharmD, PhD, about the acceptance process for biosimilars in the United States, what BBCIC is doing to help the market develop, and how the new approval pathway for biologics will affect the pace at which biosimilars come to market.
Report: Conflicting Guidelines, Rebate Walls Are Major Factors Determining Biosimilar Uptake
October 24th 2023Samsung Bioepis’ most recent biosimilar market report identified inconsistent medical guidelines, challenges with access and rebates, and acute vs chronic treatment duration as major factors influencing biosimilar uptake in the United States.
Biosimilars Check-In: BI Launches Unbranded Adalimumab; New Omalizumab Deal; CRL for Insulin Aspart
October 10th 2023Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) launches an unbranded version of its adalimumab biosimilar; Alvotech and Kashiv Biosciences partner for an omalizumab biosimilar candidate; the FDA issues a complete response letter (CRL) for Biocon’s insulin aspart biosimilar.