A recent study concludes that both hypertension and proteinuria, which are considered to be interrelated with the pharmacological action of bevacizumab, have the potential to indicate greater likelihood of therapeutic efficacy.
Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, can be used in combination with paclitaxel to treat advanced breast cancer, but hypertension and proteinuria are characteristic adverse events (AEs) associated with bevacizumab therapy. A proposed mechanism underlying bevacizumab-induced hypertension is the inhibition of VEGF, which results in decreased production of the vasodilator nitric oxide. Development of proteinuria has also been attributed to VEGF inhibition, which can decrease glomerular filtration and lead to protein leakage into urine.
A recent study in Japanese patients with breast cancer investigated whether these AEs could serve as predictors of treatment response to bevacizumab, and found that patients who developed hypertension and proteinuria early in their therapy had a stronger antitumor response.
The retrospective study, published in the Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, included 19 patients with advanced, recurrent breast cancer treated in a single center in Japan between May 2012 to January 2016. Patients were observed from the beginning of therapy to 8 weeks after. During the observation period, 7 patients developed hypertension during the study period, while 12 did not; 7 patients developed proteinuria, and 12 did not.
No patients achieved a complete response, but in the group that developed hypertension, 100% achieved a partial response (PR), while 33.3% of the non-hypertensive group achieved a PR. Similarly, 100% of the group who developed proteinuria and 33.3% of the group who did not achieved a PR. According to the authors, these findings demonstrate a significantly stronger antitumor response in the 2 AE groups (P <.05).
Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the groups with and without hypertension were 355 days versus 147 days, respectively; median PFS for patients with and without proteinuria were 504 days versus 173 days, respectively.
The authors conclude that both hypertension and proteinuria, which are considered to be interrelated with the pharmacological action of bevacizumab, have the potential to indicate greater likelihood of therapeutic efficacy.
In order to control these AEs so that therapy can continue, say the authors, patients may need to be given appropriate antihypertensive medication. Proteinuria can, when of a high grade, require discontinuation of bevacizumab; however, the authors say that patients may continue to benefit from bevacizumab even after treatment discontinuation.
Reference
Tanaka H, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Hypertension and proteinuria as predictive factors of effects on bevacizumab on advanced breast cancer in Japan. Biol Pharm Bull. 2018;41(4):644-648. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00605.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Study: Biosimilar Use, Dose Rounding Produce More Cost Savings Than Either Strategy Alone
November 18th 2023A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.
Part 3: Study Questions Usefulness of Clinical Efficacy Trials for Oncology Biosimilars in Europe
November 16th 2023In part 3 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® reviews an analysis investigating whether clinical efficacy studies have an impact on prescribing decisions for oncology biosimilars across Europe.