A newly published retrospective study found that patients who received a combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine early on had significantly increased linear growth compared to patients whose therapy was stepped up.
Conventionally, treatment for pediatric Crohn disease (CD) has focused on inducing remission with corticosteroids and maintaining remission with immunomodulators. Those patients who are refractory or intolerant to such a treatment approach are sometimes considered candidates for treatment with infliximab (an approach known as “step-up” therapy), but data on the use of early infliximab treatment in pediatric patients with CD have thus far been limited.
Information about growth failure in pediatric patients with CD has also been limited, though growth failure is recognized as a characteristic of the disease; proposed factors contributing to the problem are chronic undernutrition and the presence of inflammatory cytokines secreted from the intestine. Use of corticosteroids also increases the risk of growth failure.
A newly published retrospective study, appearing in Gut and Liver, sought to evaluate the impact of different treatment approaches on linear growth of pediatric patients with CD, and found that patients who received a combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine early on had significantly increased linear growth compared to patients whose therapy was stepped up.
A total of 33 patients were included in the study; 16 had been allocated to the step-up group and 17 to the early combined immunosuppression group. Patients in the step-up group received an oral corticosteroid dose of 1 mg/kg daily for induction therapy, which was tapered over 8 weeks, and oral azathioprine and mesalazine for maintenance therapy (infliximab could be added in this group if necessary to maintain clinical remission). The early combined immunosuppression group received infliximab at infused doses of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 for induction, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Patients in this group initiated azathioprine at daily doses of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg, and doses were adjusted as required.
Z-scores for height (which measure children’s stature for age) for the 2 groups were as follows at 1, 2, and 3 years after diagnosis:
“Our study showed that an early combined immunosuppression strategy was superior to step-up strategy in improving long-term height z-scores,” write the authors, who add that “long-term restoration of linear growth was superior in the early combined immunosuppression when compared from diagnosis.” The authors conclude that early introduction of biologics at the time of diagnosis with pediatric CD should be considered in terms of improving linear growth.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Resolution of Injection Site Reactions After Switching to Adalimumab Biosimilar
February 22nd 2025A 15-year-old girl with ulcerative colitis who developed injection site reactions to the adalimumab reference product was successfully switched to the biosimilar LBAL without recurrence of symptoms, demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of switching for medical reasons, likely due to an allergic reaction to an excipient in the originator.