Vedolizumab is approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, both forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who have had an inadequate response or loss of response to immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, or corticosteroid therapy.
Vedolizumab is approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), both forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who have had an inadequate response or loss of response to immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, or corticosteroid therapy.
A recent study sought to assess the budgetary impact of including vedolizumab in a health plan formulary as a preferred first-line biologic therapy for the treatment of UC and CD rather than only for patients who have previously failed on anti-TNF therapy.
Researchers developed a budget impact model to examine the incremental impact on a health plan’s budget if vedolizumab were to be included among existing preferred first-line biologic treatments. In an effort to reflect current treatment paradigms, researchers modeled the most current treatment options available in potential health plans, including newly approved therapies and biosimilars. “Incorporating a biosimilar in our budget impact analysis of including vedolizumab as a first-line biologic treatment represents a conservative approach, because the use of any biosimilar may result in lower costs for the payer,” wrote the authors.
In order to account for differences among health pans, the study authors considered 3 hypothetical formulary cases before the introduction of vedolizumab:
In total, researchers found that adding vedolizumab as a first-line treatment in Case 1’s hypothetical formulary demonstrated the most cost-savings, which increased from $1.63 million in the first year of the experiment to $4.68 million in the third year. For Case 2, the total annual cost savings increased from $587,000 in the first year to $1.69 million in the third year; and from $134,000 to $378,000 in Case 3. Additionally, real-world dose escalation patterns contributed to the observed differences in cost savings across the plans. In Case 1, the introduction of vedolizumab as a preferred first-line treatment substantially saves on treatment costs because it reduces the use of adalimumab more in Case 1 than in the other cases.
“The inclusion of vedolizumab on parity with existing preferred first-line biologic treatments is expected to have a substantial cost-savings impact to a health plan,” wrote the authors. “The cost-savings in this study were most pronounced in Case 1, when vedolizumab was introduced as a parity-preferred treatment alongside adalimumab as first-line treatment and alongside infliximab as second-line treatment.”
Reference
Wilson M, Lucas A, Cameron A, Luo M. Budget impact of adding vedolizumab to a health plan formulary as another first-line biologic option for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018;11(5):253-262. PMCID: PMC6207303.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Eye on Pharma: Celltrion, Costco Partnership; Amgen Sues Samsung Bioepis; Denosumab Results
August 21st 2024Celltrion's adalimumab-aaty biosimilar is now accessible for all Costco members, while Amgen sues Samsung Bioepis over the latter’s denosumab biosimilar candidate, and GlycoNex progresses its denosumab biosimilar SPD8 to phase 3 trials.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
No Differences in Long-Term Drug Survival Between Biosimilar, Originator TNF Inhibitors
August 15th 2024An analysis of subcutaneous biosimilar and originator tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for rheumatic diseases found no significant differences in survival or discontinuation rates due to inefficacy or adverse events, with biosimilars showing lower overall discontinuation rates and higher retention rates.
AI and Biosimilars: Bridging Global Health Disparities and Enhancing Treatment Efficiency
August 10th 2024Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can support global health systems in integrating biosimilars into care models, reducing health care costs, enhancing treatment decision-making strategies, and narrowing the gap between high-income and low- and middle-income countries.