While providers are increasingly comfortable with switching patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from reference biologics to biosimilars on the basis of a wealth of reassuring data on the safety and efficacy of such transitions, there are fewer data available about switching among multiple biosimilars of the same reference.
While providers are increasingly comfortable with switching patients from reference biologics to biosimilars on the basis of a wealth of reassuring data on the safety and efficacy of such transitions, there are fewer data available about switching among multiple biosimilars of the same reference.
However, switching among multiple products is increasingly common in countries where tenders for medicines are undertaken regularly and in which patients may also be asked to transition among products regularly based on the outcomes of those tenders. Data arising from these biosimilar-to-biosimilar switches is beginning to emerge, however, and the results may help providers gain more comfort with switching patients among multiple biosimilars.
A study on one such switch was presented this week during the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019, being held in Barcelona, Spain.1 In the study, 133 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were being treated at the Southampton General Hospital in Southampton, United Kingdom, consented to be switched from one biosimilar, CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra), to another, SB2 (Flixabi, Renflexis).
The patients’ disease activity scores were collected at baseline and again at week 16 or week 18, depending on whether patients were receiving dosing every 6 or 8 weeks. A historical cohort of patients receiving CT-P13 was used to assess drug persistence.
The research team found that the mean modified Harvey Bradshaw Index scores and partial Mayo scores at week 0 versus week 16 or 18 were 3.13 (standard deviation [SD], 3.31) versus 3.15 (SD, 3.17) (P = .32) and 1.53 (SD, 1.75) versus 0.91 (SD, 1.64) (P = .15) respectively.
In total, 7 patients stopped treatment due to treatment failure, 6 due to AEs, and 2 due to withdrawn consent. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and 1 withdrew for other reasons. There was no significant difference in persistence, say the authors, between this cohort and the historical CT-P13 cohort.
The authors note that more long-term data are required to confirm the current findings. However, this study does add to a growing body of evidence that suggests the safety and efficacy of multiple biosimilar switching.
In fact, these results are consistent with findings concerning switching between the same 2 infliximab biosimilars in other disease states; earlier this year, during the 6th Congress of Skin Inflammation and Psoriasis International Network, researchers from Italy presented findings from a study of 24 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who were switched from CT-P13 to SB2.2 In these patients, disease activity was substantially unchanged after the switch, and there was no statistically significant increase in AEs.
References
1. Harris C, Harris R, Young D, et al. IBD biosimilar to biosimilar infliximab switching study: preliminary results. Presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week 2019; October 29-23, 2019; Barcelona, Spain.
2. Gisondi P, Virga C, Girolomoni G. Cross-switch from CT-P13 to sb2 infliximab biosimilars in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Presented at: 6th Congress of Skin Inflammation and Psoriasis International Network; April 25-27, 2019; Paris, France. Abstract P049.
IQVIA Highlights Opportunity to Cash In on Biosimilars for Biologics Losing Market Exclusivity
November 29th 2023A report from IQVIA noted that Europe could miss out on €15 billion in cost savings by not having biosimilars for medications about to lose market exclusivity, shedding light on the implications for overall health care savings and ultimately, patient access.
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Study: Biosimilar Use, Dose Rounding Produce More Cost Savings Than Either Strategy Alone
November 18th 2023A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.
Part 3: Study Questions Usefulness of Clinical Efficacy Trials for Oncology Biosimilars in Europe
November 16th 2023In part 3 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® reviews an analysis investigating whether clinical efficacy studies have an impact on prescribing decisions for oncology biosimilars across Europe.