Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck, together with the Association of National Advertisers, have filed a lawsuit against HHS and CMS over the Trump administration’s rule requiring disclosure of list prices for drugs in direct-to-consumer television advertisements.
Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck, together with the Association of National Advertisers, have filed a lawsuit against HHS and CMS in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia over the Trump administration’s rule requiring disclosure of list prices for drugs in direct-to-consumer television advertisements.
The rule, finalized in April 2019, requires drug manufacturers to disclose their list prices for pharmaceutical products or biologics in television ads for drugs covered by Medicare or Medicaid if the wholesale acquisition cost, or list price, is $35 or more for a month’s supply. HHS says that the rule, part of the administration’s blueprint to lower drug prices, aims to improve the quality, accessibility, and affordability of government healthcare programs.
However, according to the drug makers, the rule relies on “unprecedentedly broad construction of the agency’s statutory authority,” constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, and could create confusion among consumers because most patients will not likely pay list prices for their therapies.
As a result of such confusion, says the June 14 complaint, patients may overestimate how much they would have to pay for treatment, and they incorrectly conclude that they should not discuss a given therapy with their healthcare professionals. Approximately half of Americans, says the complaint, are only responsible for copayments on prescriptions, while those covered under Medicaid pay $8 or less for drugs under their plans. The complaint states that even for the approximately 9% of Americans without insurance, out-of-pocket costs may be lower than the list price of a drug if a given patient is eligible for need-based assistance.
The drug makers point to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America guidelines for advertisements, which have led some drug makers to voluntarily provide patient information to help determine out-of-pocket costs, as 1 alternative to the administration’s rule. Some drug makers, such as Johnson & Johnson, had already begun to roll out patient cost information in advertising prior to the rule’s finalization.
HHS’ list of drugs with the highest direct-to-consumer advertising expenditures includes Lilly’s diabetes drug Jardiance (with a list price of $493 per month), Amgen’s rheumatology drug Enbrel (which carries a list price of $5174 per month and which has 2 approved but unlaunched biosimilar competitors in the United States), and Merck’s oncology drug Keytruda (with a list price of $4719 per month).
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Rising Biosimilar Adoption for an Italian Payer Will Benefit National Health Care System, Patients
April 9th 2024Data from 2021 and 2022 indicates increasing biosimilar use in an Italian health care company, with potential for full adoption in the future, benefiting both the National Health System and citizens through efficient and sustainable health care policies.
Review Highlights Most Popular European Policies to Boost Biosimilar Uptake
April 3rd 2024Although tender systems are a common strategy to encourage biosimilar utilization across Europe, policies like automatic substitution are rarely utilized, according to a systematic review of European policies and biosimilar uptake.