While 63% of respondents who had switched to a biosimilar said that they had been consulted in some form prior to the transition, 37% said that they had not been consulted (despite the fact that National Health Service guidelines require the patient to be consulted about such a switch).
Last month, UK group The Patients Association released results of a survey and focus group that sought to understand patient needs in switching to biosimilars from reference products.
In September 2018, the association surveyed 262 patients, 208 of whom were taking a biologic drug. (Notably, the survey took place prior to the launch of biosimilar adalimumab products in the United Kingdom.) The online survey contained 17 questions and was distributed to the group’s social media channels and weekly email newsletter. The group also held a 7-member focus group in Birmingham, United Kingdom, in order to understand patients’ views about whether they are receiving appropriate support during a switch to a biosimilar.
Among the survey respondents, 60.54% had rheumatoid arthritis, 10.73% had Crohn disease, 4.60% had ulcerative colitis, 4.60% had psoriatic arthritis, 0.77% had psoriasis, and 0.77% had ankylosing spondylitis. An additional 18.01% had other diseases. In total 69 people—27% of the total number of respondents—had already switched to a biosimilar.
While 63% of respondents who had switched to a biosimilar said that they had been consulted in some form prior to the transition, 37% said that they had not been consulted (despite the fact that National Health Service guidelines require the patient to be consulted about such a switch).
In total, 9 patients said that they had been given a verbal explanation of the switch, while another 9 patients reported having received both written and verbal explanations plus consultations with providers. Seven patients received a verbal explanation only, while 5 received both written and verbal explanations. Nine patients reported that they were not given any explanation of the switch. Furthermore, 49 patients (60%) said they had not been given any training or homecare support for the switch.
In free-response answers to a question asking what information would be helpful in the case of a switch, 101 patients indicated that they would like reassurance that changing to a biosimilar would not negatively affect their current health, or that if there was a change in disease activity, they could switch back to the originator product.
In the focus group, patients who had already been switched exhibited a high level of awareness of biosimilars. However, they “reported a very poor experience,” according to the association’s report. The respondents cited lack of information, lack of choice, multiple switches because of a lack of drug stock, fear about the biosimilar’s supply related to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, and not being monitored during administration of the new product.
“From the concerns raised and the suggestions about need for better information, shared decision making, and collaborative working between patients and clinicians, it would seem helpful to co-produce a set of tools to assist patients in the journey they describe,” wrote the report’s authors. “The aim would be to better inform and empower patients to take control of their situation and be more equal partners in their treatment plan and choice of medication.”
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.