The European Commission (EC) has announced that it is seeking comments on recently proposed clarifications for how the organization will handle duplicate marketing authorizations for biologics.
The European Commission (EC) has announced that it is seeking comments on recently proposed clarifications for how the organization will handle duplicate marketing authorizations (MAs) for biologics.
Currently, the EC operates under its 2011 notice about the handling of duplicate MAs, stating that “only 1 authorization may be granted to an applicant for a specific medicinal product.” However, in the case of extenuating circumstances, such as concerns about public health regarding the availability of the product or co-marketing reasons, the same applicant is allowed to submit more than 1 application for the same product. If a duplicate application is submitted, the 2011 guideline clarifies that the evaluation of the application will be a “case-by-case decision.”
Since the release of its guidance, the EC has identified potential issues in granting duplicate marketing authorizations, namely that a duplicate could be considered a “first generic.” The EC has concerns about the possible impact of duplicate authorizations specifically for the biosimilar market, fearing that it could undermine treatment options available to patients or potentially have anti-competitive effects on the market.
In order to address the potential confusion within the wording of the current guideline, the EC has proposed to add a line that reads, “Requests for duplicate marketing authorization applications need to be properly substantiated and based on sound evidence.”
In addition, the EC is also proposing the inclusion of a footnote within the document that states, “On the basis of the experience gained since the publication of the notice, the first introduction of a generic product by the holder of a biological medicinal product may not improve availability. However, a case-by-case assessment of the impact on the availability of the product will be undertaken, on the basis of evidence provided by the applicant, with due consideration of the impact of the duplicate marketing authorization on the availability of biosimilars to health care professionals and patients.”
Stakeholders are invited to comment on the proposed changes until September 10, 2018. In the meantime, requests for duplicate marketing authorization applications will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: MHRA's Procedure Enables Automatic Registration of Biosimilars Approved Elsewhere
March 18th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Coherus Biosciences Cites Biosimilars as Main Drivers of 2023 Revenue Growth
March 14th 2024In its earnings report for the fourth quarter and full year of 2023, Coherus Biosciences detailed its rising revenue growth, which it partly attributed to increased sales for its pegfilgrastim and ranibizumab biosimilars.
Filgrastim Biosimilars in Europe: 15 Years of Real-World Evidence for Zarxio
March 13th 2024A review looking back at the last 15 years of experience with the first filgrastim biosimilar (Zarxio) provides a detailed overview on how filgrastim biosimilars came to be and the evidence behind why oncologists have come to accept them as standard practice.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: MHRA's Procedure Enables Automatic Registration of Biosimilars Approved Elsewhere
March 18th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Coherus Biosciences Cites Biosimilars as Main Drivers of 2023 Revenue Growth
March 14th 2024In its earnings report for the fourth quarter and full year of 2023, Coherus Biosciences detailed its rising revenue growth, which it partly attributed to increased sales for its pegfilgrastim and ranibizumab biosimilars.
Filgrastim Biosimilars in Europe: 15 Years of Real-World Evidence for Zarxio
March 13th 2024A review looking back at the last 15 years of experience with the first filgrastim biosimilar (Zarxio) provides a detailed overview on how filgrastim biosimilars came to be and the evidence behind why oncologists have come to accept them as standard practice.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512