The House of Representatives, on Thursday, voted 230-192 to pass Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s, D-California, HR 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, although the White House has already said it will veto the measure, assuming it is ever brought to the Senate floor and passes.
The House of Representatives, on Thursday, voted 230-192 to pass Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s, D-California, HR 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, although the White House has already said it will veto the measure, assuming it is ever brought to the Senate floor and passes.
Legislators debated for hours Wednesday night and Thursday morning on what has the potential to be a complete overhaul in US prescription drug pricing.
For the first time, HHS would have the ability to allow Medicare to negotiate certain drug prices and seek rebates from drug makers if their prices soar above inflation.
The secretary of HHS would be authorized annually to negotiate prices for up to 250 of the most costly drugs that lack a generic or biosimilar competitor, including both Part D and Part B. Insulin would have been included as well, and Wednesday night, some Democratic representatives talked about the impact insulin pricing has had on their constituents.
On the other side of the aisle, Republican lawmakers advocated instead for HR 19, the Lower Costs, More Cures Act, and said that HR 3 would reduce pharmaceutical and biotech innovation, even possible cures.
The lawmakers were referring to an October Congressional Budget Office preliminary estimate that if HR 3 becomes law, between 8 and 15 fewer drugs would come to market over 10 years.
In a post earlier this month, however, PolitiFact, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization, pointed out that the FDA approves about 30 new drugs, on average, annually—or 300 new drugs over 10 years. Over time, the loss of new therapeutics would be perhaps 5%, if there were 15 fewer drugs out of 300 projected approvals. In addition, there has been no analysis about the clinical value of these potential future drugs that might not ever come to market.
HR 3 was supported by organizations like the AARP.
“High drug prices disproportionately hurt older Americans, who take an average of four to five prescription medications each month. The average annual price of a single specialty drug now costs $79,000. Medicare beneficiaries have modest median annual incomes of just over $26,000. Medications cannot help you if you cannot afford them,” said Nancy LeaMonde, AARP’s executive vice president and chief advocacy and engagement officer, in a statement Wednesday.
HR 3 will assign penalties to drug companies that refuse to negotiate with HHS on pricing. It would also require drug makers to pay rebates to Medicare if they hike their prices beyond the increase in inflation, and cap what seniors pay out of pocket for their medications to $2000 a year.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.