On an earnings call earlier this week, Pfizer CEO Ian Read said that the company will be returning to “business as normal” on its drug pricing in January, after having agreed to hold off on price increases earlier this year following pressure from the Trump administration.
On an earnings call earlier this week, Pfizer CEO Ian Read said that the company will be returning to “business as normal” on its drug pricing in January, after having agreed to hold off on price increases earlier this year following pressure from the Trump administration.
Drug pricing has been a key issue in the political arena leading up to the midterm elections next week. President Trump, together with HHS Secretary Alex Azar, have narrowed their focus to lowering drug prices for American patients through numerous actions and efforts, some of which were outlined in the American Patients First blueprint.
To underscore the efforts to address drug prices, Trump began to put pressure on pharmaceutical companies individually. Following a conversation between Read and Trump in July, Pfizer announced that it would hold off on a planned price increase. Pfizer was not the only company to halt price hikes; around the same time, Merck, Novartis, and Roche also agreed to hit pause on price increases for the rest of 2018.
“Pfizer is rolling back price hikes, so American patients don’t pay more. We applaud Pfizer for this decision and hope other companies do the same. Great news for the American people!” tweeted Trump at the time.
However, on the latest earnings call, Read signaled that the agreement to hold off on price hikes would end at the end of 2018, at which point the company will return to pricing based on the market. “We price to the marketplace, we price competitively,” said Read.
Of note, the administration is not relying solely on voluntary actions from pharmaceutical companies to lower drug prices. Last week, Trump unveiled a new plan that aims to reduce Medicare’s costs for prescription drugs where CMS could set its prices for some drugs, including biologics, based on the prices paid in other nations.
The plan was met with mixed responses from industry stakeholders. CMS is currently taking comments on the pricing model until Monday, December 31, 2018, after which it plans to issue a proposed rule in spring 2019.
Eye on Pharma: Keytruda Biosimilar Deal; German Court Bans Imraldi; New Biosimilars for Japan
June 17th 2025Alvotech and Dr. Reddy's partner to develop a Keytruda biosimilar, a German court bans Humira biosimilar over patent dispute, and Samsung Bioepis enters a strategic agreement with NIPRO Corporation in Japan.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.