Since Novex’s commercial launch, the first national pharmacovigilance plan for a biosimilar monoclonal antibody has been implemented, and data from this post-marketing surveillance show that, in terms of tolerability, this biosimilar has a similar safety profile to that of the reference product.
At the American Society of Hematology’s 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia, researcher Gustavo Milone, MD, and his team will present a study that investigates the post-marketing trends of Novex, a biosimilar rituximab that has been approved in Argentina for the same indications as the reference product (MabThera, Rituxan).1 Since Novex’s commercial launch, the first national pharmacovigilance plan for a biosimilar monoclonal antibody has been implemented, and data from this post-marketing surveillance show that, in terms of tolerability, this biosimilar has a similar safety profile to that of the reference product.
In order to determine deviations from expected frequencies of adverse events (AEs), a prospective treatment registry for the biosimilar was implemented from the start of its commercialization on November 26, 2014. Data in the study are reported until June 30, 2017. Physicians, 180 in total, tracked age, gender, indication, dose, dose frequency, and date of treatment initiation and finalization for each patient receiving the biosimilar.
The study comprised the records of 525 patients who had at least 1 follow-up. The majority of patients were female (52%), the mean age was 63.3 years (range, 10-90), and most patients received the biosimilar rituximab for hematological disease (91.2% of cases). The treatment duration ranged from 154 to 309 days, with the number of treatment cycles varying from 1 to 12. Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were collected from 24 patients with 29 AEs.
The most frequently reported AEs were:
The researchers noted that 41 treatments with rituximab were initiated before the launch of the product; assuming treatment began with MabThera, these 41 treatments imply switching to the biosimilar from the reference.
Researchers investigating data from the post-marketing surveillance found a similar incidence of AEs after the use of rituximab biosimilar when compared to the published data of the reference product. Thus, in terms of tolerability, the biosimilar has a similar safety profile compared with its reference.
Reference
1. Milone G, Penna M, Fernandez F, et al. Post-marketing surveillance with a biosimilar of rituximab (Novex) in Argentina. Presented at the American Society of Hematology 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition 2017, December 9, 2017; Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract 2131. https://ash.confex.com/ash/2017/webprogram/Paper102866.html
Where clinical, regulatory, and economic perspectives converge—sign up for Center for Biosimilars® emails to get expert insights on emerging treatment paradigms, biosimilar policy, and real-world outcomes that shape patient care.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 31st 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: Keytruda Biosimilar Deal; German Court Bans Imraldi; New Biosimilars for Japan
July 31st 2025Alvotech and Dr. Reddy's partner to develop a Keytruda biosimilar, a German court bans Humira biosimilar over patent dispute, and Samsung Bioepis enters a strategic agreement with NIPRO Corporation in Japan.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
July 31st 2025The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Switching From Avastin to Bevacizumab-bvzr in CRC, NSCLC Can Reduce Medicare Costs
July 31st 2025Monthly savings from fully converting Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from reference bevacizumab to bevacizumab-bvzr could fund 13,887 and 8,959 additional patient-months of treatment, respectively, according to a cost-effectiveness study.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 31st 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: Keytruda Biosimilar Deal; German Court Bans Imraldi; New Biosimilars for Japan
July 31st 2025Alvotech and Dr. Reddy's partner to develop a Keytruda biosimilar, a German court bans Humira biosimilar over patent dispute, and Samsung Bioepis enters a strategic agreement with NIPRO Corporation in Japan.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
July 31st 2025The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Switching From Avastin to Bevacizumab-bvzr in CRC, NSCLC Can Reduce Medicare Costs
July 31st 2025Monthly savings from fully converting Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from reference bevacizumab to bevacizumab-bvzr could fund 13,887 and 8,959 additional patient-months of treatment, respectively, according to a cost-effectiveness study.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512