Kashyap Patel, MD: Biosimilars that are currently available in the oncology space—the first one approved was filgrastim; Sandoz was the first one that got approval. Then subsequently one of the products from Pfizer Inc was approved, Nivestym. Prior to that, though, there was a drug called Granix that was approved. Now there are about 3 more biosimilars approved in the therapeutic class as well. One is pegfilgrastim. That of course is supportive care, Udenyca. And then there’s a drug called Fulphila.
Then 2 more drugs approved in the therapy class, which are trastuzumab and the bevacizumab. Both of these drugs are in the regular therapy class approved just in last quarter. With the entry of so many biosimilars in the oncologic therapeutic market, we do expect to have a significant change the way physicians prescribe that. And when we’re looking into the value-based model going forward, these drugs are going to play a tremendous role in helping physicians, patients, providers, and payers.
The efficacy and potency of biosimilars are measured based on the totality of evidence. FDA created a separate path back in 2009 under the BPCIA [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act], to help incorporate safety, efficacy, and the lack of immunogenicity of the biosimilar. And the FDA created a path called the totality of the evidence evaluation, where multiple points are measured beginning from the structural similarity, to the analytical variance, to the chemical composition, as well as PK/PD [pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic], and immunogenicity. And if the compound with all the totality of factors is identified as very identical to the parent compound, the trial does not have to be done in the clinical space, simply because the FDA has understood the structural similarity as well as other aspects of chemicals. If they are more similar to parent compounds, then there will be no difference in efficacy as well.
For example, the drug called Udenyca was approved based on the totality of evidence, and trial in human volunteers but not in actual patients.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.