Anti–tumor necrosis factor drugs are expensive, and there are a limited number of choices for IBD treatment, highlighting the need to use every existing agent optimally.
Anti—tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, including infliximab and adalimumab, have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, primary nonresponse (defined as no initial clinical benefit to therapy) and secondary loss of response (defined as a loss of response after an initially favorable outcome) are common, with resulting adverse outcomes. Among infliximab- and adalimumab-treated patients with IBD, primary nonresponse occurs in 10% to 30% of patients, while secondary loss of response occurs in 23% to 46% of patients by 12 months. Anti-TNF drugs are expensive, and there are a limited number of choices for IBD treatment, highlighting the need to use every existing agent optimally. Recently, anti-TNF dosing guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a potential strategy to optimize treatment and maximize benefit from these drugs, but there has been no formal consensus about TDM-guided anti-TNF dosing.
Recently, a group of 25 IBD experts from the Australian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Consensus Working Group and other international experts published recommendations on TDM in anti-TNF therapy that supported the role of TDM in optimizing treatment with anti-TNF agents for patients with IBD, particularly in situations of treatment failure.
The committee recommends TDM of anti-TNF agents upon treatment failure, following successful treatment induction, and when contemplating a drug holiday. However, the group said there is inconsistent evidence for proactive TDM, and therefore advise that TDM should be performed for patients in stable remission only if results are likely to impact clinical management. The assembly’s statement was published on October 13, 2017, in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
The statement presents an appropriate therapeutic range for infliximab and adalimumab that was delineated to make the guidelines more clinically applicable. The statement also makes the following recommendations:
In order to reach their conclusions, the experts examined scenarios concerning when TDM of anti-TNF agents should be performed, the general approach to patients with symptoms of active disease while receiving anti-TNF therapy, the interpretation of TDM results in patients with confirmed active inflammatory disease who are on anti-TNF therapy, interpreting TDM results among patients in clinical remission who are on anti-TNF therapy, target drug trough levels, anti-drug antibodies, and TDM for other types of biological agents as well as future therapies.
The final recommendations were reached through a consensus process using a modified Delphi technique that used 3 iterations. The panelists agreed on the level of evidence and grade of recommendation according to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, and all members of the delegation approved the final draft recommendations prior to submission for publication.
“In conclusion, TDM of anti-TNF agents is an important component of personalized therapy in IBD,” the experts state. “These consensus statements should provide a practical guide to applying TDM of anti-TNF agents in treatment optimization for IBD patients.”
Comparable Pregnancy and Infant Milestones With Infliximab Biosimilars vs Originator in IBD
March 15th 2025A study evaluating pregnancy outcomes and infant developmental milestones found similar outcomes between pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received reference infliximab and those who received a biosimilar.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Adalimumab Biosimilar Switching Policy Shows Long-Term Success in IBD
February 26th 2025Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched from reference adalimumab (Humira) to a biosimilar under a mandatory nonmedical switching policy maintained long-term safety, efficacy, and treatment persistence comparable to those who remained on the originator drug, according to a Canadian study.