As Regeneron gears up for a legal battle with biosimilar competitors for its reference aflibercept, CareFirst files a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson for restricting biosimilar ustekinumab competition; Celltrion and Accord BioPharma file with the FDA to approve their respective biosimilar candidates.
As Regeneron gears up for a legal battle with biosimilar competitors for its reference aflibercept, CareFirst files a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for restricting biosimilar ustekinumab competition, and Celltrion and Accord BioPharma file with the FDA to approve their respective biosimilar candidates.
New Lawsuits Regarding Biosimilars
Image credit: onephoto - stock.adobe.com
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals filed a lawsuit against Samsung Bioepis over the development of the latter’s aflibercept biosimilar candidate. The biosimilar references Regeneron’s Eylea, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agent used to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
The lawsuit claims that Samsung Bioepis infringed 51 of Regeneron’s patents related to Eylea, as described in the 83-page complaint. Regeneron chose to file the suit in a West Virginia federal court, the same court that presided over Regeneron’s previous legal battle with Viatris, also over the development of an aflibercept biosimilar. The Viatris suit resulted in the judge ruling in favor of Regeneron, saying that Viatris infringed 1 patent that isn’t set to expire until June 2027.
Reference biologic manufacturers have a long history of suing biosimilar manufacturers over patent disputes, presumably to delay biosimilar competitors from entering the market. This tactic has been seen in the adalimumab (Humira) space, delaying competition until 2023, and ustekinumab (Stelara) space, where 2 lawsuits have resulted in market delays until 2025.
However, in the instance of ustekinumab, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield filed a lawsuit against the reference manufacturer J&J, alleging that the company is “scheming” to delay competition, creating a monopoly in a profitable market “beyond the date of [Stelara’s] legitimate patent exclusivity.”
The law firm managing CareFirst’s case argued that without biosimilar competition, health care purchases for ustekinumab must pay pricing above what would be sustained in a competitive market.
If CareFirst comes out on top, the class action will break J&J’s ustekinumab monopoly and enable payers and consumers to obtain biosimilar versions of Stelara for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
FDA Accepts Applications for 2 Biosimilars
The FDA has accepted 2 biologics license applications (BLAs) for biosimilars, including 1 ustekinumab product and 1 denosumab candidate.
Celltrion announced that its application for CT-P41, a proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Prolia/Xgeva (denosumab), was also accepted for review, as reported by MarketScreener. If approved, the product would be used to treat osteoporosis, as well as prevent bone fractures in patients with bone-related cancers at high risk of fracture. Another BLA for Sandoz’ denosumab biosimilar is also under review.
Accord Biopharma also submitted a BLA for an ustekinumab biosimilar (DMB-3115). If approved, DMB-3115 will be used to treat plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn disease, and ulcerative colitis.
In the US, reference ustekinumab (Stelara) accumulated $13.9 billion in sales in 2022 and is one of the top-selling biologics in the world.
"The ability of DMB-3115's reference product, Stelara, to treat autoimmune diseases is well established and we're excited to take this important step toward providing patients a more accessible avenue to treatment for conditions that present such a significant disease burden," said Chrys Kokino, US president of Accord. "Our mission to go beyond the biology of medicine includes seeking to ease the financial burden for patients and the US health care system by providing medicines that may be more affordable, such as biosimilars."
In 2013, the joint development for DMB-3115 was undertaken by Dong-A Socio Holdings and Meiji Seika Pharma, with exclusive commercialization rights granted to Intas Pharmaceuticals through a partnership announced in 2021. Accord Biopharma is a global subsidiary of Intas Pharmaceuticals and it will be responsible for commercialization of the biosimilar in the US.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Etanercept Biosimilar Switch Shows Stable Outcomes and Disease Control in RA
May 13th 2025Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from Enbrel (reference etanercept) to a biosimilar maintained remission, even after their dose was reduced, with no signs of worsening based on clinical scores, ultrasound scans, or lab tests, according to a new study.
Paving the Way for Equitable Biosimilar Access in Australian Dermatology Clinics
May 13th 2025Australia’s growing reliance on high-cost biologics for inflammatory skin diseases has placed significant pressure on its health system—but a new report suggests biosimilars could offer financial relief, provided uptake barriers are addressed through policy reform and education.