This past week, the FDA began the long-awaited process of adding a 4-letter suffix devoid of meaning, to the end of newly approved biologics’ nonproprietary names.
This past week, the FDA began its long-awaited process of adding a 4-letter suffix, devoid of meaning, to the end of newly approved biologics’ nonproprietary names. This move reflects a change in previous policy that only added the suffixes to biosimilars’ nonproprietary names.
The first implementation of this policy change came last Thursday with the approval of Roche’s Hemlibra (emicizumab-kxwh), which is one of the first new medicines in nearly 2 decades to treat people with hemophilia A, and was followed by the approval of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical’s Mepsevii (vestronidase alfa-vjbk), which treats pediatric and adult patients with the rare genetic condition mucopolysaccharidosis type VII.
This policy and name change has been expected since January 2017, when the FDA announced finalized guidelines that biosimilars’ and biologics’ names should include these 4-letter, non-meaningful suffixes.
However, this change has not been entirely popular amongs healthcare stakeholders. Last year, 70 groups of non-profits and other stakeholders, headed by the Alliance for Safe Biologics, requested in a letter that the FDA use meaningful suffixes for biosimilar nonproprietary names, as they did with the first biosimilar approval of Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz). The group stated that meaningful suffixes were more desirable than the random suffixes that were described in the FDA’s guidance. The Alliance for Safe Biologics has also stated that a survey of 401 US pharmacists showed that 77% preferred manufacturer-based suffixes over options without meaning.
There have also been concerns that the use of this new naming system for biologics and biosimilars could lead to confusion when implementing pharmacovigilance. A research article published in eLife found that approximately 1% of entries in the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database represent redundant reports. This is a serious concern because duplicate reports can increase the alleged significance of an adverse event (AE) association with a drug. The study goes on to question whether tracking fewer names for drugs, rather than more, could lead to improved pharmacovigilance, especially when considering that AE’s are predominantly reported by nonmedical persons.
The World Health Organization (WHO) had proposed a similar change to that made by the FDA. They were considering the use of biological qualifiers (BQ) to assign international nonproprietary names to biosimilars. Since this proposal was made, however, the WHO has announced that, for the time being, it will not proceed with this change. In response to this news, The Biosimilars Council praised WHO on twitter, saying that the use of an added BQ for biosimilar drugs would act as an additional barrier to patient access and savings.
Despite dissent of the need for suffixes, the FDA remains firm in its belief that the designations are necessary. “Nonproprietary names that include distinguishing suffixes can serve as a key element to identify a specific product in spontaneous adverse event reporting…other product-specific identifiers, such as proprietary names or NDCs, may not be available or change over time,” said the FDA in its guidance.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.