In this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, discussed current policy initiatives that could help biosimilar adoption and how the Inflation Reduction Act is expected to influence the adalimumab market.
Readers can also check out part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, and podcast 1 now.
Starting in January next year, the United States will welcome up to 10 adalimumab biosimilars referencing Humira, one of the most profitable drug in the world. Currently, there are several barriers to uptake to biosimilars, including payer and pharmacy benefit manager interference with formulary placement, misaligned incentives that favor prescribing the reference product over biosimilars, and reference manufacturer-led anti-competitive practices preventing biosimilar market entry. However, there are a number of policy and procedural efforts being put in place by congressional leaders, the FDA, and HHS the could help to boost biosimilar uptake and give adalimumab biosimilars a real chance to gain market share.
Today, I’m joined by Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, a nonprofit organization aimed at the advancement of biosimilar adoption through collaboration with biosimilar manufacturers. Prior to her work with the Forum, she served as vice president and global corporate affairs lead of immunology, inflammation, and biosimilars at Pfizer and she is a staunch advocate for biosimilar adoption and the advancement of biosimilar legislation, including President Biden’s 2021 executive order on increasing competition in the pharmaceutical sector and the Biosimilars User Fee Amendment III, also known as BsUFA III. Our conversation today will focus on how federal policies could shape the adalimumab market next year and what congressional leaders can do now to help the process.
Show notes
This special episode is part of a larger series called “WHEN CHOICE ARRIVES: Competition & Consequences,” consisting of 4 articles and 2 podcasts. The series delves into everything that stakeholders need to know as everyone prepares for the 2023 introduction of adalimumab biosimilars.
To read part 1 of this series, “Biosimilars to Bring a Bumper Crop of Adalimumab Options,” click here.
To read part 2 of this series, “For Patients and Employers, 2023 Means a Changed Landscape,” click here.
To read part 3 of this series, “How Adalimumab Biosimilars Will Impact Clinicians,” click here.
To read part 4 of this series, "How Payers Can Prepare for Adalimumab Biosimilars," click here.
To listen to the other podcast in this series, “What Will Year 1 Look Like for Adalimumab Biosimilars?” click here.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Switching Patterns Highlight Nocebo Effect in European Patients Using Amgevita
July 23rd 2024About half of the patients in a European study who transitioned from reference adalimumab to a biosimilar version stayed on the biosimilar at the 1-year mark. However, researchers warned about a possible nocebo effect resulting in some patients switching back to the originator.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Real-World Study: No Increase in Health Resource Costs After Infliximab Biosimilar Introduction
July 20th 2024Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.