Amgen has been sued by Genentech, a Roche company, for withholding information on its biosimilar to Genentech’s bevacizumab (Avastin), thereby creating a barrier for filing a potential patent infringement lawsuit.
In its complaint, Genentech states that Amgen has violated the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) as it develops the biosimilar to bevacizumab. Genentech expected access to Amgen’s manufacturing information of the biosimilar to determine whether the manufacture or sale of the product would infringe on Genentech’s patents. The company also wants sufficient time for a legal intervention, if need be, before the biosimilar is launched in the market.
The lawsuit, filed in a US District Court in Delaware, claims that Amgen is refusing to share relevant “confidential information” with Genentech’s consultants, beyond the Abbreviated Biologics License Application (aBLA), which would allow an infringement analysis. Per the BPCIA statute, Genentech expected to have not just the copy of the aBLA for review, but additional information that describes the steps used to manufacture the biosimilar product—in this case, bevacizumab—within 20 days of filing the aBLA on January 4, 2017. This would allow Genentech to provide Amgen with a list of patents within 2 months of receiving information from the company.
The complaint also accuses Amgen of improperly withholding consent for 4 experts to review their aBLA, which “violates subsection (l)(1)(C) of the BPCIA.”
Genentech would like its 60-day window for providing its list of patents to Amgen to begin only after Amgen provides all the required information. The company also seeks to prevent marketing of Amgen’s biosimilar till it meets all obligations per the BPCIA.
Amgen has witnessed this “patent dance” before, with one of its own products, epoetin alfa (Epogen). Amgen had then sued the biosimilar manufacturer, Hospira, for noncompliance with the BPCIA.
The competition for the high stakes involved with this multi-billion dollar industry has resulted in companies tapping into loopholes left by the fairly new rules around biosimilars. Amgen is already involved in a case with Sandoz that will decide whether a biosimilar applicant can completely opt out of the BPCIA information exchanges, and if so, what information would the originator company end up with. Another argument is over the 6-month obligatory waiting period for biosimilar manufacturers after they have informed the originator about its biosimilar product.
Sandoz Report: A Unified Approach to Overcoming Drug Shortages
October 10th 2024A report from Sandoz emphasizes the need for collaboration among stakeholders to eliminate drug shortages impacting over 90% of hospital systems in the US, recommending policy changes and actions to address the ongoing issue, which has caused treatment delays and increased costs.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: EC Approved Ustekinumab; Zymfentra Expansion; Biosimilar Policy Briefing
September 26th 2024The European Commission (EC) approved Celltrion's ustekinumab biosimilar for chronic inflammatory diseases, Celltrion expanded access to Zymfentra (subcutaneous infliximab-dyyb) through partnerships with Cigna and Express Scripts, and the Association for Accessible Medicines held a policy briefing addressing barriers to biosimilar adoption.