According to a filing made in the Republic of Korea, Samsung Bioepis has disclosed that Merck has terminated the companies' development and commercialization agreement for a follow-on insulin glargine product referencing Sanofi’s Lantus.
According to a filing made in the Republic of Korea, Samsung Bioepis has disclosed that Merck has terminated the companies' development and commercialization agreement for a follow-on insulin glargine product referencing Sanofi’s Lantus.
Despite tentative FDA approval received in July 2017, Merck and Samsung have faced significant challenges in bringing the follow-on biologic, Lusduna Nexvue, to market in the United States.
One hurdle, patent infringement litigation brought by reference product developer Sanofi, was ongoing, and triggered an automatic stay on the FDA’s final approval of up to 30 months.
Merck concluded to end the partnership after assessing the current and future market for the product, including pricing and the product’s cost, before reaching its decision. In ending the partnership, Merck paid Samsung $155 million to cover investments made thus far in the product, plus interest, reported FiercePharma. However, its partnership with Samsung on other biosimilars in oncology and immunology remain unchanged.
Drug developer Mylan, in a partnership with Biocon, is having similar troubles with its follow-on insulin referenced on Lantus. The product, which is already approved in Europe and sold under the name Semglee, is currently undergoing its own patent lawsuit from Sanofi. In the 70-page lawsuit filed in October 2017, Sanofi alleged that Mylan is infringing on 18 patents and asked a federal court in New Jersey to intervene in the launch efforts.
The lawsuit, however, is not the only challenge Mylan has faced in bringing its follow-on insulin to market, as it received a Complete Response Letter (CRL) from the FDA in June, citing production problems at the Malaysia plant responsible for producing the product.
Competing against reference Lantus in the follow-on insulin market already is Boehringer Ingelheim’s Basaglar, the first follow-on insulin glargine to earn FDA approval.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Biosimilar Business Roundup for October 2023—Podcast Edition
November 5th 2023On this episode, we discuss the biggest news to come out of October 2023, including 3 regulatory approvals, 2 complete response letters, and new data and industry insights that have the potential to impact the entire US biosimilar industry.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Biosimilars Business Roundup For August 2023—Podcast Edition
September 5th 2023On this episode, we’re giving an overview of some of the biggest stories in the business space regarding biosimilars, like the approval of the first neurology biosimilar, growth projections from company quarterly expense reports, and some analyses about the health of the market.
AMCP Nexus: Panelists Share Current Scope of Biosimilar Industry
October 26th 2023Panelists at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting chronicled the current state of the US biosimilar market, including current policies impacting the market, recent regulatory decisions, and the developing arguments around requirements for clinical efficacy studies.
Report: Conflicting Guidelines, Rebate Walls Are Major Factors Determining Biosimilar Uptake
October 24th 2023Samsung Bioepis’ most recent biosimilar market report identified inconsistent medical guidelines, challenges with access and rebates, and acute vs chronic treatment duration as major factors influencing biosimilar uptake in the United States.