In part 2 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® explores a cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating the use of subcutaneous trastuzumab biosimilars to treat breast cancer in a French hospital setting.
In part 2 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® explores a cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating the use of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) trastuzumab products to treat breast cancer in a French hospital setting.
Global Biosimilars Week is an annual awareness campaign created by the International Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association. The event runs from November 13-17, 2023 and serves as a way to expand awareness of biosimilars, their clinical effects compared to originators, the economic impacts of using them, and the growing industry worldwide. To read part 1, click here. To read part 3, click here.
In the present analysis, published in The Breast, researchers found that the implementation of a trastuzumab programs that prioritizes the use of the SC version of reference trastuzumab (Herceptin) and EMA-approved IV trastuzumab biosimilars (Kanjinti, Ogivri, Ontruzant, Herzuma, Trazimera) is cost-effective for French hospital systems.
Researchers collected data from a French Diagnostic Related Groups (French DRG) database. The study period was set at 1 year (2019), encompassing 18 cycles of trastuzumab administration at 3-week intervals. The study population included 544 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer from Normandy France.
Two simulations were evaluated:
The cost of stay was based on the cost of consumables related to the route of trastuzumab administration (SC vs IV), the time patients spent with health care professionals, and the type of chemotherapy that was administered to patients receiving trastuzumab.
Simulation 1 revealed that the use of an IV trastuzumab biosimilar in combination with IV chemotherapy led to a cost saving of €11,889, amounting to €12 per patient per year and a 14% a 60% cost reduction compared to the current situation. However, this simulation also showed an increase in the length of chemotherapy sessions compared with the current time (10 minutes per patient per year).
Simulation 2 demonstrated that the use of SC reference trastuzumab (in monotherapy) generated €15,376 in cost savings (€51 per patient per year), a 60% cost reduction compared with the current situation. This simulation also resulted in a time saving of 68 and 78 minutes per patient per year compared to the current situation and simulation 1, respectively.
The simulations had different impacts on productivity. In Simulation 1, the impact was mainly due to the time of administration of SC reference trastuzumab in combination IV chemotherapy. The study estimated that the maximum difference between the groups (IV biosimilar/IV chemotherapy and SC reference product/IV chemotherapy) could be 21 min.
In Simulation 2, the impact on productivity earning potential was mainly due to the time saving relative to the SC administration of trastuzumab in monotherapy, which is unlikely to vary over time. The study found that the productivity earning potential was the factor that caused the most variation in Simulation 2, with a variation in results (±27%) greater than the variation in the productivity parameter (±20%).
The study has limitations: it didn't evaluate the direct impact or costs of a biosimilar incentive program, lacked specific day hospital cost data, and relied on accurate coding for French DRG information. Moreover, it focused solely on a hospital perspective, neglecting a broader societal viewpoint for a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab biosimilars versus original drugs.
Reference
Barat EC, Arrii MLE, Soubieux-Bourbon A, Daouphars M, Varin R, Tilleul PR. Cost effectiveness of using trastuzumab biosimilars compared to trastuzumab original drugs to treat breast cancer in a hospital setting. Breast. Published online October 11, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2023.103588
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Denosumab Biosimilars Earn Positive CHMP Opinion for Bone Loss and Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
November 26th 2024The European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion for the denosumab biosimilars SB16 for all indications referencing Prolia and Xgeva.