In an expert review, the authors provide transparency about biosimilar production, approvals, risk, and benefits to help improve confidence that the same safety and efficacy can be expected from biologics and their biosimilars.
Despite their size, complexity, and heterogeneity, biopharmaceuticals and their biosimilars can be expected to be safe and effective irrespective of batch or production history, according to a recent review in Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, published online January 10, 2018, by William C. Lamanna, PhD, and colleagues.
The researchers, all employees and shareholders of Sandoz/Novartis, conclude that modern analytic methods, manufacturing quality systems, and comparability requirements for the evaluation of manufacturing changes help to ensure the consistent quality and clinical performance of biologics throughout their product lifecycles. More than a decade of real-world experience with biosimilars in Europe and the demonstrated success and safety of biosimilars have not done away with skepticism—particularly in the United States—about product regulation and quality. In this expert review, the authors provide transparency about biosimilar production, approvals, risk, and benefits to help improve confidence that the same safety and efficacy can be expected from biologics and their biosimilars.
Biologic therapies have a demonstrably long track record of consistent safety and effectiveness over the entire course of their often decades-long lifecycles. There have been only rare historical instances where clinically relevant changes have occurred—a situation defined as “clinical drift.” The review analyzes these cases and discusses modern tools in place to prevent them, including improved analytics, quality systems, and regulatory frameworks. Variability resulting in clinical differences is extremely rare, with only a single verifiable case resulting in adverse events in over 35 years and over 260 products, the reviewers note.
Despite this history, as the number of biosimilars increase, concerns regarding the ability of biosimilars to maintain equivalent clinical performance with their reference products have been disseminated. At the center of these concerns is the misconception that the sheer complexity and heterogeneity of biologic products precludes effective monitoring and control of relevant quality attributes. But, the reviewers point out, biosimilars employ the same post-approval regulatory framework and quality systems as their respective originator products to maintain quality and clinical performance. “Effective strategies for maintaining product quality and clinical performance are a pivotal regulatory requirement for the production of biopharmaceuticals, including biosimilars,” the review states.
To this end, production quality systems based around the central concepts of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and the Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) have been developed to help ensure consistent production of safe and efficacious products over time and worldwide, irrespective of manufacturing process changes.
GMP was established in the 1990s to set up international requirements for a huge array of quality control measures, ranging from personnel and equipment to laboratory controls. In addition to GMP, the Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) was established, which has as its core objectives consistently achieving a realization of safe and effective medicines, establishing and maintaining product control, and continually improving products and processes to mitigate quality risks. Analytical capabilities and modern quality systems are always evolving to ensure consistent biopharmaceutical quality.
The review discusses recent improvements in manufacturing quality systems including:
Finally, quality systems must be continually evaluated and improved for robust maintenance of product quality, and to improve confidence in the safety and efficacy of reference biologics and their biosimilar products.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.