Earlier this month, US Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, sent a letter to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Joseph Simons urging the FTC to “examine whether makers of biologic medicines are using strategies like ‘pay-for-delay’ to hinder or delay biosimilars from entering the market.”
Earlier this month, US Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, sent a letter to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Joseph Simons urging the FTC to “examine whether makers of biologic medicines are using strategies like ‘pay-for-delay’ to hinder or delay biosimilars from entering the market.”
According to the letter, “Biologics play an important role in treating many serious illnesses and are among the fastest growing classes of therapeutic products… Without biosimilar competition, US patients and payers will likely see additional price increases on biologics in the years to come.”
The senators cite examples of alleged pay-for-delay strategies, specifically the settlement agreements that pharmaceutical company AbbVie has entered into with both Amgen and Samsung Bioepis over their adalimumab biosimilars, referenced on AbbVie’s originator product, Humira. The drug is the world’s top-selling prescription product, with annual sales of $16 billion.
Under each of the settlement agreements, Amgen and Samsung are unable to launch their biosimilars in the United States until 2023, but both products will be available for purchase on the European market as soon as the end of 2018.
“This means that while European patients will benefit from biosimilar competition later this year, Americans may be without access to Humira biosimilars for almost 5 more years. While such terms in patent settlement agreements may not always be inappropriate, the incentives for parties to delay biosimilar entry are present, and biologic markets could be susceptible to patent settlement abuse,” reads the letter.
Furthermore, this is not the first time that the FTC has been called on to investigate these very settlements. In April 2018, patient advocacy group Patients for Affordable Drugs (P4AD) also urged the FTC to examine the same agreement between AbbVie and Samsung.
“AbbVie is using pay-for-delay deals to keep a cheaper generic off the market and patients are the victims. We believe it is illegal and anti-competitive, and we are asking the FTC to step in and protect patients from AbbVie’s price hikes,” said the president and co-founder of P4AD, David Mitchell, in a statement.
Conversely, AbbVie has strongly opposed using the term “pay-for-delay” to describe the agreements. In a prior statement, the company said “AbbVie’s settlements with Amgen and Samsung Bioepis are in no way pay-for-delay arrangements. AbbVie is not paying Amgen or Samsung Bioepis, and in fact both Amgen and Samsung Bioepis will be paying royalties to AbbVie once their adalimumab biosimilar products launch in the [United States].”
AAM Report: Generics and Biosimilars Savings Reach $445 Billion in 2023, Part 1
September 18th 2024Savings from generic and biosimilar drugs totaled $445 billion in 2023, showing promise for the growth of both markets and highlighting the success of expansion policies for these products, according to a new report from the Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM).
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Expanding Biosimilar Adoption: Insights and Strategies With Dr Sophia Humphreys
September 16th 2024Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, MHA, BCBBS, director of system formulary management at Sutter Health, discusses the challenges of expanding biosimilars into new therapeutic areas and highlights the role of education, competitive pricing, and integrated delivery networks in improving adoption and market growth.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
The Future of Biosimilar Gene Therapies: Key Issues and Potential
September 11th 2024While biosimilars could potentially lower costs and improve access to gene therapies, significant hurdles in regulation, manufacturing, intellectual property, and market size pose challenges to their development and market entry.
BioRationality: FDA Clarification Provides New Indications and Process Change for Biosimilars
September 9th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains the FDA's new guidelines on post-approval changes for biosimilars, emphasizing the processes for reporting modifications, comparability assessments, and the potential for biosimilars to introduce new indications or formulation changes, which could significantly impact their market competitiveness and accessibility.