No differences in drug levels or disease activity were found when adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were switched from originator infliximab (Remicade) to a biosimilar infliximab (Inflectra) as part of routine care, according to the results of a Dutch study.
No differences in drug levels or disease activity were found when adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were switched from originator infliximab (Remicade) to a biosimilar infliximab (Inflectra) as part of routine care, according to the results of a Dutch study published in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Switching to the biosimilar and performing therapeutic drug monitoring as part of routine care optimizes infliximab therapy efficiently and makes it more cost effective, the authors conclude.
The study, conducted by E.M.H. Schmitz, PhD, and colleagues, followed 133 patients with IBD (64% had Crohn’s disease [CD]; 36% had ulcerative colitis [UC]) for 12 months. All patients had been receiving innovator infliximab therapy for a median of 52 months before the switch to biosimilar. Half of the patients received concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. The researchers took blood samples just before the first, second, fourth, and seventh infusion of the biosimilar and measured infliximab trough levels, antibodies to infliximab (ATI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The investigators also calculated disease activity scores using the Crohn’s disease activity index for patients with CD and the Truelove-Witts disease activity index for patients with UC.
Before the switch to biosimilar infliximab, the investigators found widely varying infliximab levels (median, 3.5µg per mL). ATI were detected in 6% of patients. Most patients were in remission or had mild disease (CD, 82%; UC, 90%). After switching to the biosimilar, 26% of patients (26% CD; 27% UC) discontinued therapy within 12 months, mostly because of subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events (AEs, 9.8%). AEs included general malaise and fatigue, arthralgia, skin problems, and infusion reactions. There were no differences in levels of infliximab or CRP or disease activity between the 4 time points (P ≥0.0917).
Nine percent of the cohort experienced higher disease activity. In the majority of cases, however, complaints of higher disease activity were not shown objectively with higher disease activity scores or increased CRP levels. Increased disease activity was only shown objectively in 2 patients.
In 2 cases, patients also had high disease activity on infliximab innovator therapy. Finally, 3.8% of the cohort discontinued biosimilar therapy because they were in remission, 1 patient temporarily stopped infliximab therapy because she was expecting to go into labor, and 2 patients accidently received innovator instead of biosimilar infliximab.
The researchers said that they found that patients with detectable ATI before switching had a relative risk of 3.2 for discontinuation of biosimilar therapy compared with patients with no ATI. “This indicates that patients with autoimmune response to [infliximab] have a statistically significantly higher risk of therapy failure,” they note. “It was shown that antibodies to [infliximab] innovator are highly similar to antibodies to the biosimilar, so these patients would probably also have experienced therapy failure if they would have stayed on innovator therapy.”
The researchers also said that the novelty of biosimilars could induce the nocebo effect (disease worsening due to negative expectations) and noted that the switch to biosimilars was the first such switch in their hospital. “Patients were easily put back on innovator treatment if they had complaints that could possibly be switch-related due to the lack of experience with biosimilars in clinical practice,” they said.
The researchers conclude that biosimilar infliximab is safe and effective. They said the high proportion of discontinuers in their study were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
Functional Similarity Between Ustekinumab Biosimilar ABP 654, Stelara in Crohn Disease
January 18th 2025Functional similarity of the ustekinumab biosimilar ABP 654 (Wezlana) and the reference product (Stelara) was confirmed by a series of in vitro studies, which support the totality of evidence for the biosimliar's FDA approval.