A phase 1 study in China found that pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the liraglutide biosimilar RD12014 and the reference product (Victoza) in healthy male participants.
A phase 1 study in China found that pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the liraglutide biosimilar RD12014 (Sunshine Lake Pharma) and the reference product (Victoza) in healthy male participants. The authors used their findings to support a new drug application in China, which does not currently have a liraglutide biosimilar on the market.
Liraglutide is used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D), which accounts for more than 90% of diabetes cases. The authors said that the prevalence of the disease is increasing and noted the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, blindness, kidney disease, and other conditions associated with T2D. Because traditional anti-diabetic drugs, such as insulin and sulfonylureas, may cause hypoglycemia, they wrote, “it is necessary to develop new drugs of new mechanisms” to effectively control blood glucose and reduce the risk of complications.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), according to the authors, reduces blood glucose levels, suppresses glucagon secretion, protects pancreatic beta-cells, slows gastric emptying, and helps reduce body weight. However, since GLP-1 has a short half-life, liraglutide was developed as a longer half-life GLP-1 analog.
The reference product is currently used as a subcutaneous injection to treat T2D. It was approved as an adjunct therapy to diet and exercise for T2D by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2009 and by the FDA in 2010. The reference product was also approved to prevent cardiovascular events in adults with T2D by the FDA in 2017 and by China in 2020.
The investigators said that several biosimilars referencing Victoza are in clinical trials, but there are no liraglutide biosimilars currently on the market in China. Their study evaluated pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the liraglutide biosimilar candidate RD12014 in 49 healthy male participants. The primary PK endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0−last). Subjects received a single dose of either the biosimilar or reference product, followed by a seven-day washout period, and then a single dose of the other biologic.
PK Equivalence Was Demonstrated Between RD12014 and Victoza
The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax (90% CI, 106-118) and AUC0-last (90% CI, 107-117) for the biosimilar and reference product were within the equivalence range of 80% to 125%.
Overall, the safety profiles of the 2 biologics were similar, the authors said, with 14 adverse events (AEs) occurring in 11 subjects (22%) in the biosimilar group and 19 AEs in 16 subjects (33%) in the reference product group. Thirteen AEs in the biosimilar group and 12 in the reference product group were considered treatment related. All AEs were mild and were resolved without medical intervention by the end of the study. The most common treatment-related AEs were an increase in serum uric acid (12%), and an increase in blood bilirubin (10%), with comparable incidence in the 2 groups. The authors added that there were no major hypoglycemic episodes during the trial, indicating that GLP-1 analogs “reduce blood glucose in a glucose-dependent mode and may even reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.”
Regarding immunogenicity, blood samples from all 49 subjects were negative for anti-drug antibodies, before and after receiving the study drugs.
The investigators concluded their study demonstrated PK similarity of RD12014 to the reference product, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles, and added that their findings were used to support a new drug application in China.
Reference
Zhou R, Guo L, Gao X, et al. A phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of the biosimilar (RD12014) with liraglutide (Victoza) in healthy Chinese male subjects. Clin Transl Sci. 2022;15(10):2458-2467. doi:10.1111/cts.13374
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: How Developers Can Expand Their Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilar Portfolio
March 24th 2025Monoclonal antibodies lead biosimilar approvals because of their large market size, well-defined regulatory pathways, and technological feasibility, whereas other biologics encounter development challenges but may see increased adoption as regulatory frameworks advance.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.