Japanese investigators say more needs to be known about what happens post treatment with biosimilar infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Japanese investigators hope to shed light on durability of clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following discontinuation of treatment with an infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13, Remsima).
“It is the next great issue whether disease activity can be maintained…after discontinuation of CT-P13, because no evidence is available” regarding the clinical outcome after biosimilar infliximab is stopped in RA, they wrote.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease that when uncontrolled can lead to joint destruction and deformity, lowering patients’ quality of life. Advances in the use of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, including biosimilars, have improved clinical outcomes, leading to low disease activity and clinical remission.
In the ongoing IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I, investigators are evaluating whether continued treatment with biosimilar infliximab is not inferior to treatment with the originator product in maintaining nonclinical relapse. The new study, IFX-SIRIUS STUDY II, continues with the evaluation of what happens once treatment with the biosimilar is stopped.
The clinical findings will be important, the investigators note, because infliximab is a costly drug whether the originator or a biosimilar is used. Therefore, it is important to know if disease activity can be suppressed following discontinuation of the biosimilar in patients with RA.
Previous Findings Show Lasting Benefit
Previous studies have suggested that the disease can be controlled following treatment cessation with antirheumatic drugs, so the investigators expect encouraging findings from IFX-SIRIUS STUDY II. According to findings published in 2010, of 102 patients with RA, 55% of those who attained low disease activity on infliximab were able to discontinue the drug for more than 1 year without radiologically detectable joint destruction.
Results from the HONOR study, reported in 2016, suggested the same long-term, medication-free benefit. The study enrolled 197 patients with RA treated with adalimumab. One year after discontinuation, 79% of patients who began the period with deep remission had not experienced flaring of inflammation and showed no functional or structural damage. The study also found that readministration of the drug to patients with flare-ups was effective in controlling RA.
Despite such findings, more needs to be known about “optimal approaches for discontinuation,” the investigators wrote.
In IFX-SIRIUS STUDY II, disease activity will be measured by musculoskeletal ultrasound as well as by clinical disease activity in order to accurately assess inflammation at the joint level. Investigators will also measure serum levels of cytokines and chemokines to determine whether these biomarkers can predict nonclinical relapse after discontinuation of biosimilar infliximab.
“We expect that a certain proportion of patients with RA will have clinical relapse after discontinuation of CT-P13; thus, we will also evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 retreatment in patients with RA who have clinical relapse,” they said.
The prospective, interventional, single-arm, multicenter study based in Japan will begin with enrollment of ≤ 80 patients and baseline screening, followed by evaluations at 3-month intervals and final evaluation at 48 weeks. For enrollment, patients must have been on biosimilar infliximab during the IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I and have experienced a nonclinical relapse during that study period.
Patients will discontinue CT-P13 at points throughout the study period, and if they have a relapse following discontinuation, CT-P13 will be readministered.
The primary end point is the proportion of patients who had clinical relapse during the 48-week period.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).