United States Pharmacopeia (USP), the FDA, and others deliver constructive critique on how India can bolster quality in its biopharmaceutical industry.
The expiration of biologics patents has created opportunity for new biopharmaceutical industry to step in with biosimilars. Although this opportunity is recognized in India, the country needs to develop top-down quality to improve standards and procedures, according to a panel of international experts.
“With this changing landscape, industry must evaluate the relevance of quality management systems,” the group wrote about the direction India must go to become a world-class player in biosimilars and biologics in general.
The recently published report was the result of a meeting last year of representatives from United States Pharmacopeia, the Association of Biotechnology Led Enterprises, the FDA, and the World Health Organization. India has standout companies that are competing on the world stage with their medicinal products, including biosimilars, but it is dogged by concerns that there is substantial room for improvement in its pharmaceutical industry overall.
Building a "Culture of Quality"
The group recommended that a “culture of quality” be developed starting in the educational system with training programs on quality processes and a “focus on quality beyond compliance.”
“The curriculum in universities should include knowledge of quality management processes in the biopharmaceutical industry to inculcate [a] quality mindset very early into the students,” the report said.
Further, it recommended that heavier reliance be placed on automation and digitization to ensure accuracy, measurability, and appropriate record keeping.
The recommendations included an emphasis on pharmacovigilance partly because biosimilars undergo fewer clinical trials than originator products and follow-up data are crucial to understand these products.
“Biologics are complex molecules and manufacturing them requires changes at various stages of the manufacturing process,” the report said. “Manufacturers are required to perform rigorous risk assessments through analytical comparability studies for all product quality attributes to demonstrate that there is no impact on quality, safety, and efficacy of the biologics, before or after changes in manufacturing process.”
To accomplish these assessments, it’s necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of the biological product and its development from a “quality by design” perspective, the panel said.
Further, “to develop the necessary culture of quality, manufacturers must first establish robust and rugged control processes,” the report said.
Guidelines for biologic similarity in India were first published in 2012 and then revised in 2016.
The panel said typical red flags during quality inspections worldwide include:
Quality, the panel said, starts with ensuring that all involved understand their responsibility for developing and maintaining quality and protecting patient safety, “and this must be instilled from top management.” It said building a culture of quality could be done with:
The group specifically recommended that India enhance its focus on automation and digitization, enforcement of regulatory requirements, postmarketing surveillance, and regulator training. Developing a culture of quality could be done by stimulating effective communication and decision making, assigning clear responsibilities, establishing safety protocols, and building trust and respect among staff.
“Defining and ensuring trust and respect among staff is essential to create and maintain a culture of quality. Trusted employees will contribute more, bring more productivity, and will be honest in their actions,” the report said.
India has also been challenged to upgrade its regulatory processes to meet world standards and enable its drugs to be more accepted in world markets.
Reference
Uppal A, Koduri CK, Yadlapalli S, Chirmule N, Chakrabarti R, Atouf F. Recommendations for enhancing quality and capability of Indian biopharmaceutical industry: summary of a workshop. J Pharm Sci. Published online July 21, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.07.014
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.