In the wake of Coherus’ 30% reduction in workforce last week—a move that followed the company’s complete response letter from the FDA regarding its CHS-1701, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar candidate—the California-based biosimilar developer has sustained yet another blow to its business.
In the wake of Coherus’ 30% reduction in workforce last week—a move that followed the company’s complete response letter from the FDA regarding its CHS-1701, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar candidate—the California-based biosimilar developer has sustained yet another blow to its business.
Daiichi Sankyo said in a July 5 press release that it has decided to discontinue its partnership with Coherus BioSciences in the development of CHS-0214, an investigational etanercept biosimilar.
While the Tokyo-based Daiichi Sankyo said that its phase 3 trial for CHS-0214 had met its primary endpoint of determining equivalence between CHS-0214 and its reference product groups, the fact that a commercial manufacturing process to facilitate a supply of the biosimilar product in Japan could not be established had forced the company to sever its ties with Coherus on the product’s development and commercialization.
CHS-0214 was 1 of 2 biosimilars on which Daiichi Sankyo and Coherus had agreed to partner in 2012; the second product, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, appears to be unaffected by the end of the firms’ agreement on the etanercept biosimilar.
The end of the Daiichi Sankyo arrangement is the second such termination for Coherus’ CHS-0214 in the past year; Coherus regained the rights to the biosimilar candidate from Shire after the latter company’s “strategic portfolio review” in 2016.
Of the 3 biosimilar products currently in Coherus’ pipeline, only its adalimumab candidate, CHS-1420, appears to be fully on track; after an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) study comparing CHS-1420 to reference adalimumab (Humira) successfully met its endpoints, Coherus initiated a phase 3 study in patients with psoriasis in 2015. Coherus incorporated a switch between the reference and CHS-1420 in the phase 3 study after receiving feedback from the FDA and EMA. The company plans to file a Biologics License Application (BLA) for the product in 2018.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Biosimilar Business Roundup for October 2023—Podcast Edition
November 5th 2023On this episode, we discuss the biggest news to come out of October 2023, including 3 regulatory approvals, 2 complete response letters, and new data and industry insights that have the potential to impact the entire US biosimilar industry.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Biosimilars Business Roundup For August 2023—Podcast Edition
September 5th 2023On this episode, we’re giving an overview of some of the biggest stories in the business space regarding biosimilars, like the approval of the first neurology biosimilar, growth projections from company quarterly expense reports, and some analyses about the health of the market.
AMCP Nexus: Panelists Share Current Scope of Biosimilar Industry
October 26th 2023Panelists at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting chronicled the current state of the US biosimilar market, including current policies impacting the market, recent regulatory decisions, and the developing arguments around requirements for clinical efficacy studies.
Report: Conflicting Guidelines, Rebate Walls Are Major Factors Determining Biosimilar Uptake
October 24th 2023Samsung Bioepis’ most recent biosimilar market report identified inconsistent medical guidelines, challenges with access and rebates, and acute vs chronic treatment duration as major factors influencing biosimilar uptake in the United States.