The ability to identify factors that predict efficacy of anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents is crucial if clinicians are to optimize treatment and minimize side effects and costs.
Over the past 20 years, the use of anti—tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents has revolutionized the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by allowing them to avoid the use of steroids, promoting mucosal healing, reducing hospitalizations and surgeries, and dramatically improving quality of life. However, primary nonresponse to these drugs or loss of response (LOR) over time due to immunogenicity or treatment-related side-effects are a concern.
Nonresponse to anti-TNF therapy occurs in 20% to 40% of patients in clinical trials and in 10% to 20% of patients in real-world scenarios; the incidence of secondary LOR ranges from 23% to 46% a year after treatment initiation. Thus, the abililty to identify factors that predict efficacy of these drugs is crucial if clinicians are to optimize treatment and minimize side effects and costs.
To this point, studies investigating predictive factors have produced controversial results, according to a review by Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, MD, PhD, and colleagues, published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences. The authors undertake this goal through a literature search on the predictive factors of the short- and long-term benefits of anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients, evaluating multiple patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol in both controlled clinical trials and real-world studies.
The authors found the following factors to be predictive of response to anti-TNF treatment in clinical practice:
Patient-related factors:
Disease-related factors:
Treatment-related factors:
The review also lists factors that could be predictive of response to anti-TNF therapy, but that are not yet available in clinical practice. These factors, which could be seen in controlled trials, include genetic variants of particular genes in patients with CD.
“Clearly, in the future, the creation of specific algorithms with the combination of multiple variables could deeply improve their predictive baseline strength before starting [anti-TNF] agents,” the researchers note. “At the same time, in the era of precision medicine, newly diagnosed IBD patients will need to have their genetic, microbiome, and immune characteristics measured at time 0, then matched to the most appropriate biological or immunosuppressive treatment based on likelihood of response/adverse effects.”
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
IQVIA Highlights Opportunity to Cash In on Biosimilars for Biologics Losing Market Exclusivity
November 29th 2023A report from IQVIA noted that Europe could miss out on €15 billion in cost savings by not having biosimilars for medications about to lose market exclusivity, shedding light on the implications for overall health care savings and ultimately, patient access.
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).