The VOLTAIRE-X randomized controlled trial determined the adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 (adalimumab-adbm, Cyltezo; Boehringer Ingelheim) met the FDA’s criteria to be designated as interchangeable with the reference product (Humira).
The VOLTAIRE-X randomized controlled trial determined the adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 (adalimumab-adbm, Cyltezo; Boehringer Ingelheim) met the FDA’s criteria to be designated as interchangeable with the reference product (Humira).
Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis received the reference product biweekly for 48 weeks or switched 3 times throughout the study between the reference product and biosimilar. The authors of the article describing the trial wrote that pharmacokinetic endpoints were equivalent and clinical outcomes were highly similar between groups.
Interchangeability
The investigators explained that the “interchangeable” designation is only used in the United States, and allows the interchangeable biosimilar to be substituted for its reference product by a pharmacist without prior approval of the prescriber, where allowed by state law.
The FDA’s criteria includes a demonstration of biosimilarity, the expectation that the biosimilar will produce the same clinical result as the originator in any given patient, and that the risk of switching between the biosimilar and reference product is not greater than the risk of using the reference product without switching. Cyltezo, based on the VOLTAIRE-X trial, is the first adalimumab biosimilar and the first monoclonal antibody to achieve interchangeable status.
VOLTAIRE-X was a phase 3 double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted across 49 sites in Europe and North America, all of which used the US-licensed reference product. The trial aimed to assess whether multiple switches between the reference product and Cyltezo leads to equivalent pharmacokinetic parameters and a similar safety and immunogenicity profile compared to continuous treatment with the reference product.
After a run-in period of 14 weeks, patients were randomized to the continuous (n = 118 patients) and switching (n = 120 patients) arms and received adalimumab treatment every other week for a total of 48 weeks. The switching group switched between the reference product and biosimilar at weeks 14, 18, and 22. The authors described patient demographics and disease characteristics at baseline as “well balanced” between treatment arms.
Pharmacokinetic Endpoints Were Within Equivalence Margins
Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCτ,30-32) and maximum observed drug plasma concentration (Cmax,30-32) measured during weeks 30-32.
The authors reported that the primary pharmacokinetic endpoints fell within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%. The adjusted mean ratios of switching to continuous treatments for AUCτ,30-32 and Cmax,30-32 were 105% (90% CI, 97-115) and 101% (90% CI, 93%-110%).
Clinical Outcomes Were “Highly Similar” Between Groups
At week 32, 110 out of 118 (85%) and 94 out of 119 (79%) patients in the switching and continuous groups, respectively, had a 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. The authors commented, “PASI scores over time were highly similar in the two arms across the entire trial period.” Also at week 32, 83 of the112 (70%) and 77 of the 109 (65%) patients in the switching and continuous groups, respectively, had a static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) response of 1 or lower (clear or almost clear).
Immunogenicity and Safety
Similar proportions of patients developed anti-drug antibodies, 101 out of 112 (90%) in the switching group and 104 out of 110 (95%) in the continuous group. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 46 of 112 (41%) patients in the switching group and 46 of 110 (42%) in the continuous reference product group.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered related to study treatment were experienced by 14 (12%) and 22 (18%) of patients in the switching and continuous arms, respectively. The most common were injection-site erythema (n = 6) and arthralgia (n = 3). The investigators reported that fewer than 5% of patients experienced a severe TEAE, AE of special interest, or TEAE resulting in discontinuation of treatment, “with no notable difference between treatment groups.”
The authors concluded that switching 3 times between the adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 and the reference product “resulted in pharmacokinetic equivalence, highly similar efficacy and immunogenicity outcomes, and comparable safety.” Based on this data, the biosimilar was approved by the FDA as interchangeable with the reference product. They added that despite speculation that multiple switches might increase immunogenicity, the results of VOLTAIRE-X found similar incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the continuous and switching groups.
Reference
Menter A, Cohen S, Kay J, et al. Switching between adalimumab reference product and BI 695501 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis (VOLTAIRE-X): a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(5):719-728. doi:10.1007/s40257-022-00708-w
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.