Allergan likely won’t do much with biosimilars beyond the company’s current involvement in projects involving 4 cancer-drug biosimilars developed in partnership with Amgen, according to Allergan CEO Brent Saunders. In an interview with Bloomberg on February 22, 2017, Saunders also predicted that many pharmaceutical companies will eventually retreat from the biosimilars business because the market will not be able to support the large number of molecules that will soon be approved.
Several biosimilars have been marketed or are in advanced stage clinical trials, including those for Rituxan, Herceptin, Avastin, Humira, Enbrel, Remicade, and Lantus. Amgen, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Pfizer Inc, AstraZeneca PLC, Merck & Co Inc, Biogen Inc, and Novartis AG have all made substantial investments or have partnerships for developing biosimilars. In addition to these companies, there are Chinese, Indian, and Korean competitors, including Samsung Biologics Co Ltd.
It is not easy to predict how quickly biosimilars will be adopted because the market for biosimilars is unsettled. One important factor is continuing patent litigation, which has prevented the marketing of several approved biosimilars. In the United States, for instance, only 2 of the 4 approved biosimilars have been marketed.
The other big concern is that none of the approved biosimilars has yet been deemed interchangeable with the reference product by the FDA, preventing the potential substitution of biosimilars for reference products without the approval of prescribers. States, meanwhile, are preparing for interchangeability—the senate in New Mexico has passed a bill that will allow pharmacists to substitute a physician-approved biosimilar for its reference drug. The bill now awaits a House vote.
The bigger drug developers, with their larger marketing and legal budgets, stand an advantage over the smaller ones in the legal process. Additionally, because the bigger companies will get to market first, late entrants may need a drastic price cut to compete. Such discounting is “great for society, but it’s bad for business,” said Saunders. He warned that the biosimilar business will end up looking very much like the standard generic drug business but with much higher legal, research and development, and manufacturing costs.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.